Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T18:30:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-09T18:30:32Z
dc.date.created2019-08-14T23:12:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationChristensen, Lene Vøllestad, Nina Køpke Veierød, Marit Bragelien Stuge, Britt Cabri, Jan Maria Hendrick Robinson, Hilde Stendal . The Timed Up & Go test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2019, 43, 110-116
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/76835
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, a standardized functional mobility test, has been proposed as aphysical performance-based measure in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP).Objectives:This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate physical function by the use of TUG in pregnantwomen with PGP compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women, and to identify factors asso-ciated with increased TUG.Methods:In total, 25 pregnant women with PGP, 24 asymptomatic pregnant and 25 asymptomatic non-pregnantwomen participated. One-way analysis of variance was used to explore difference in TUG between the groupsand multiple linear regression analyses to explore associations between TUG and potential explanatory variables.Results:The time on TUG varied among pregnant women with PGP, and was significantly higher (mean (95% CI)6.9 (6.5, 7.3) seconds) than for asymptomatic pregnant (5.8 (5.5, 6.0), p < 0.001) and non-pregnant (5.5 (5.4,5.6), p < 0.001) women. In the total study sample, group, increased BMI and sick leave were significantlyassociated with increased TUG (p-values≤0.02). In pregnant women with PGP, pain intensity was the onlysignificant clinical factor associated with increased TUG (p= 0.002).Conclusion:Pregnant women with PGP used longer time and showed larger variation in TUG than asymptomaticpregnant and non-pregnant women, this underpins that TUG targets activities relevant to PGP. Our resultsprovide new knowledge about factors influencing TUG time. Importantly, multivariable analyses suggest thatpain intensity should be considered when interpreting TUG time in pregnant women with PGP.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleThe Timed Up & Go test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorChristensen, Lene
dc.creator.authorVøllestad, Nina Køpke
dc.creator.authorVeierød, Marit Bragelien
dc.creator.authorStuge, Britt
dc.creator.authorCabri, Jan Maria Hendrick
dc.creator.authorRobinson, Hilde Stendal
cristin.unitcode185,52,10,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for tverrfaglig helsevitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1716044
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Musculoskeletal Science and Practice&rft.volume=43&rft.spage=110&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleMusculoskeletal Science and Practice
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.startpage110
dc.identifier.endpage116
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.006
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-79937
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2468-8630
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/76835/2/Christensen_2019_TUG.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International