Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-04-27T18:30:13Z
dc.date.available2020-04-27T18:30:13Z
dc.date.created2019-01-29T18:19:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationKo, Vinnie Hjort, Nils Lid Hobæk Haff, Ingrid . Focused information criteria for copulae. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 2019, 46, 1117-1140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/74879
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we extend the focused information criterion (FIC) to copula models. Copulas are often used for applications where the joint tail behavior of the variables is of particular interest, and selecting a copula that captures this well is then essential. Traditional model selection methods such as the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) aim at finding the overall best‐fitting model, which is not necessarily the one best suited for the application at hand. The FIC, on the other hand, evaluates and ranks candidate models based on the precision of their point estimates of a context‐given focus parameter. This could be any quantity of particular interest, for example, the mean, a correlation, conditional probabilities, or measures of tail dependence. We derive FIC formulae for the maximum likelihood estimator, the two‐stage maximum likelihood estimator, and the so‐called pseudo‐maximum‐likelihood (PML) estimator combined with parametric margins. Furthermore, we confirm the validity of the AIC formula for the PML estimator combined with parametric margins. To study the numerical behavior of FIC, we have carried out a simulation study, and we have also analyzed a multivariate data set pertaining to abalones. The results from the study show that the FIC successfully ranks candidate models in terms of their performance, defined as how well they estimate the focus parameter. In terms of estimation precision, FIC clearly outperforms AIC, especially when the focus parameter relates to only a specific part of the model, such as the conditional upper‐tail probability.
dc.languageEN
dc.titleFocused information criteria for copulae
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorKo, Vinnie
dc.creator.authorHjort, Nils Lid
dc.creator.authorHobæk Haff, Ingrid
cristin.unitcode185,15,13,0
cristin.unitnameMatematisk institutt
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1667978
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian Journal of Statistics&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=1117&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleScandinavian Journal of Statistics
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage1117
dc.identifier.endpage1140
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12387
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-77979
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0303-6898
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/74879/1/paper%2B3.pdf
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/237718
dc.relation.projectNFR/235116


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata