Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-04-21T19:56:26Z
dc.date.available2020-04-21T19:56:26Z
dc.date.created2019-11-07T15:58:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationIsasi, Iraia Irusta, Unai Rad, Ali Bahrami Aramendi, Elisabete Zabihi, Morteza Eftestøl, Trygve Christian Kramer-Johansen, Jo Wik, Lars . Automatic Cardiac Rhythm Classification With Concurrent Manual Chest Compressions. IEEE Access. 2019, 7, 115147-1151159
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/74734
dc.description.abstractElectrocardiogram (EKG) based classification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) rhythms is important to guide treatment and to retrospectively elucidate the effects of therapy on patient response. OHCA rhythms are grouped into five categories: ventricular fibrillation (VF) and tachycardia (VT), asystole (AS), pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and pulse-generating rhythms (PR). Clinically these rhythms are grouped into broader categories like shockable (VF/VT), non-shockable (AS/PEA/PR), or organized (ORG, PEA/PR). OHCA rhythm classification is further complicated because EKGs are corrupted by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) artifacts. The objective of this study was to demonstrate a framework for automatic multiclass OHCA rhythm classification in the presence of CPR artifacts. In total, 2133 EKG segments from 272 OHCA patients were used: 580 AS, 94 PR, 953 PEA, 479 VF, and 27 VT. CPR artifacts were adaptively filtered, 93 features were computed from the stationary wavelet transform analysis, and random forests were used for classification. A repeated stratified nested cross-validation procedure was used for feature selection, parameter tuning, and model assessment. Data were partitioned patient-wise. The classifiers were evaluated using per class sensitivity, and the unweighted mean of sensitivities (UMS) as a global performance metric. Four levels of clinical detail were studied: shock/no-shock, shock/AS/ORG, VF/VT/AS/ORG, and VF/VT/AS/PEA/PR. The median UMS (interdecile range) for the 2, 3, 4, and 5-class classifiers were: 95.4% (95.1-95.6), 87.6% (87.3-88.1), 80.6% (79.3-81.8), and 71.9% (69.5-74.6), respectively. For shock/no-shock decisions sensitivities were 93.5% (93.0-93.9) and 97.2% (97.0-97.4), meeting clinical standards for artifact-free EKG. The UMS for five classes with CPR artifacts was 5.8-points below that of the best algorithms without CPR artifacts, but improved the UMS of latter by over 19-points for EKG with CPR artifacts. A robust and accurate approach for multiclass OHCA rhythm classification during CPR has been demonstrated, improving the accuracy of the current state-of-the-art methods.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.titleAutomatic Cardiac Rhythm Classification With Concurrent Manual Chest Compressionsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorIsasi, Iraia
dc.creator.authorIrusta, Unai
dc.creator.authorRad, Ali Bahrami
dc.creator.authorAramendi, Elisabete
dc.creator.authorZabihi, Morteza
dc.creator.authorEftestøl, Trygve Christian
dc.creator.authorKramer-Johansen, Jo
dc.creator.authorWik, Lars
cristin.unitcode185,53,61,11
cristin.unitnameNasjonal kompetansetjeneste for prehospital akuttmedisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1745047
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=IEEE Access&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=115147&rft.date=2019
dc.identifier.jtitleIEEE Access
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.identifier.startpage115147
dc.identifier.endpage115159
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935096
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-77831
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2169-3536
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/74734/1/Automatic%2BCardiac...pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata