Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorTallberg, Peter
dc.contributor.authorUlberg, Randi
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen Dahl, Hanne-Sofie
dc.contributor.authorHøglend, Per A
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-07T05:03:12Z
dc.date.available2020-04-07T05:03:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 06;20(1):150
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/74400
dc.description.abstractBackground Creating a case formulation is an important and basic skill in psychotherapy meant to guide treatment. A patient’s interpersonal pattern is an essential part of a case formulation. Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) is a well-known structured method to describe interpersonal patterns. The CCRT method is based on the assumption that humans display a central relationship theme, which is shown in most relationships as well as in the patient-therapist relation. The CCRT scoring is based on how the patient describes interactions with others, in therapy sessions or in a specific interview. These descriptions are transcribed. Raters then score the identified relational episodes by choosing elements from the clustered categories of Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self. The method has shown high validity and reliability. Inter rater reliability is generally good: Cohen’s kappa ranging from 0.55 to 0.70. To decide CCRT pattern from transcribed material is time consuming and labour intensive This study investigates a labour- and timesaving version of the method. Methods This study aimed to investigate rater agreement in a simplified method of scoring the CCRT, based directly on live semi-structured dynamic interviews without transcribing the material. Fifty-two patients referred for psychotherapy in a clinical trial, were scored for CCRT pattern. Based on information that came forth during the two-hour interview, raters scored the patients choosing elements from the clustered categories of Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self. More than one category in each component could be chosen without ranking. Five raters compared two by two were investigated. Inter rater reliability was measured by Cohen’s kappa. Results Mean kappa for Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self was .33, .41 and .45 respectively. Mean kappa for CCRT in total was .41 among 5 raters. Conclusion In this simplified method to score the CCRT based on oral dynamic interviews, fair to moderate IRR was obtained. Trial registration First Experimental Study of Transference-interpretations (FEST307/95). Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleCore conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2020-04-07T05:03:13Z
dc.creator.authorTallberg, Peter
dc.creator.authorUlberg, Randi
dc.creator.authorJohnsen Dahl, Hanne-Sofie
dc.creator.authorHøglend, Per A
dc.identifier.cristin1806173
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02558-4
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-77506
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/74400/1/12888_2020_Article_2558.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid150


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International