Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorHansen, Peter M.
dc.contributor.authorMikkelsen, Søren
dc.contributor.authorAlstrøm, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorDamm-Hejmdal, Anders
dc.contributor.authorRehn, Marius
dc.contributor.authorBerlac, Peter A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T06:01:50Z
dc.date.available2023-11-07T06:01:50Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2023 Nov 02;31(1):71
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/105681
dc.description.abstractBackground Major incidents (MI) happen infrequently in Scandinavia and mass shootings are even less frequently occurring. Case reports and research are called for, as literature is scarce. On 3rd July 2022, a mass shooting took place at the shopping mall Field’s in Copenhagen, Denmark. Three people were killed and seven injured by a gunman, firing a rifle inside the mall. A further 21 people suffered minor injuries during the evacuation of the mall. In this case report, we describe the emergency medical services (EMS) incident response and evaluate the EMS´ adherence to the MI management guidelines to identify possible areas of improvement. Case presentation Forty-eight EMS units including five Tactical Emergency Medical Service teams were dispatched to the incident. Four critically injured patients were taken to two trauma hospitals. The deceased patients were declared dead at the scene and remained there for the sake of the investigation. A total of 24 patients with less severe and minor injuries were treated at four different hospitals in connection with the attack. The ambulance resources were inherently limited in the initial phase of the MI, mandating improvisation in medical incident command. Though challenged, Command and Control, Safety, Communication, Assessment, Triage, Treatment, Transport (CSCATTT) principles were followed. Conclusions The EMS response generally adhered to national guidelines for MI. The activation of EMS and the hospital preparedness program was relevant. Important findings were communication shortcomings; inherent lack of readily available ambulance resources in the initial critical phase; uncertainty regarding the number of perpetrators; uncertainty regarding number of casualties and social media rumors that unnecessarily hampered and prolonged the response. The incident command had to use non-standard measures to mitigate potential challenges.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s); licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleThe Field’s mass shooting: emergency medical services response
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2023-11-07T06:01:51Z
dc.creator.authorHansen, Peter M.
dc.creator.authorMikkelsen, Søren
dc.creator.authorAlstrøm, Henrik
dc.creator.authorDamm-Hejmdal, Anders
dc.creator.authorRehn, Marius
dc.creator.authorBerlac, Peter A.
dc.identifier.cristin2203790
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01140-7
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid71


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International