Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2022-04-04T07:03:38Z
dc.date.available2022-04-04T07:03:38Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/93259
dc.description.abstractThe increasing focus on the openness of results and outcomes from health services as well as the quality of care that patients receive has led to increased initiatives for assessing and reporting the quality of health care as well as monitoring quality improvement initiatives. The overall aims of this thesis were to validate a questionnaire used in national cross-sectional surveys among patients receiving residential treatment for substance dependence in Norway, to test the data material gathered via these surveys for use as quality indicators and to follow employees’ reported use of these results in local quality-improvement work. Survey data based on paper and online questionnaires from four years among patients and employees were explored. The exploratory factor analyses with data from the 2013 patient-experience survey resulted in three scales: “treatment and personnel” with 12 items, “milieu” and “outcome” with five items each. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the patient-reported experience scales was 2.3% for the “treatment and personnel” scale, 8.1% for “milieu” and 4.8% for “outcome”. The employees reported generally positive attitudes towards patient-experience surveys, and 40–50% of them had implemented quality initiatives based on the results of the patient surveys. The analyses of survey data demonstrated the good psychometric properties of the patient questionnaire. When adjusted for a specific set of variables, the three scales comprising the patient questionnaire functioned well as patient-experience-based quality indicators, and employees’ reported use of the results suggests that patient-experience surveys are viewed as useful and valuable tools in quality improvement.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper I. Haugum M, Iversen HH, Bjertnaes O, Lindahl AK. Patient experiences questionnaire for interdisciplinary treatment for substance dependence (PEQ-ITSD): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway. BMC psychiatry. 2017;17(1):73. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1242-1. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1242-1
dc.relation.haspartPaper II. Haugum M, Iversen HH, Helgeland J, Lindahl AK, Bjertnaes O. Patient experiences with interdisciplinary treatment for substance dependence: an assessment of quality indicators based on two national surveys in Norway. Patient preference and adherence. 2019;13:453-64. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S194925. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: http://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S194925
dc.relation.haspartPaper III. Haugum M, Iversen HH, Bjertnaes O. National surveys of patient experiences with addiction services: do employee use the results in quality initiatives and are results improving over time? (resubmitted BMC Health Services Research). To be published. The paper is not available in DUO awaiting publishing.
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1242-1
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S194925
dc.titleInpatients’ experiences with interdisciplinary treatment for substance dependence: Measurement, quality indicators and use of resultsen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorHaugum, Mona
dc.identifier.cristin2092590
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-95831
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/93259/1/PhD-Haugum-2022.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata