Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-03-13T20:30:34Z
dc.date.available2021-03-13T20:30:34Z
dc.date.created2020-12-23T09:15:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationKonst, Bente Nøtthellen, Jacob A Næss, Stine Nalum Båth, Magnus . Novel method to determine recursive filtration and noise reduction in fluoroscopic imaging - a comparison of four different vendors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/83978
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study attempted to develop a method to measure the applied recursive filtration and to determine the noise reduction of four different fluoroscopic systems. The study also attempted to elucidate the importance of considering the recursive filter for quality control tests concerning signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) or image quality. The vendor's settings for recursive filtration factor (β) are, unfortunately, often not available. Hence, a method to determine the recursive filtration and associated noise reduction would be useful. Method: The recursive filter was determined by using a single fluoroscopic series and the method presented in this study. The theoretical noise reduction based on the choice of β was presented. In addition, the corresponding noise reduction, evaluated as the ratio of the standard deviation of the pixel value between a series with β equal to zero (recursive filtration off) and β > 0, was determined for different pulse rates given by pulses per second (pps), doses (mAs) and recursive filter. The images were acquired using clinically relevant radiation quality and quantity. Results: The presented method to measure the recursive filter exhibited high accuracy (1.08%) and precision (1.48%). The recursive filtration and noise reduction were measured for several settings for each vendor. The recursive filtration settings and associated recursive filtration factors for four different vendors were presented. Conclusions: This study presented an accurate method to determine applied recursive filtration, which was easy to determine. Hence, for all quality control purposes, including noise evaluation, it was possible to consider the essential noise reduction given by the settings for recursive filtration. It was also possible to compare the recursive filtration settings and associated recursive filtration within and between vendors.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleNovel method to determine recursive filtration and noise reduction in fluoroscopic imaging - a comparison of four different vendors
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorKonst, Bente
dc.creator.authorNøtthellen, Jacob A
dc.creator.authorNæss, Stine Nalum
dc.creator.authorBåth, Magnus
cristin.unitcode185,15,4,0
cristin.unitnameFysisk institutt
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1862991
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage281
dc.identifier.endpage292
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13115
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-86713
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1526-9914
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/83978/1/acm2.13115.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International