Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorKristian Tveitå, Einar
dc.contributor.authorSandvik, Leiv
dc.contributor.authorMarius Ekeberg, Ole
dc.contributor.authorGunnar Juel, Niels
dc.contributor.authorBautz-Holter, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-09T01:03:48Z
dc.date.available2015-10-09T01:03:48Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008 Jul 17;9(1):103
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/46350
dc.description.abstractBackground The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that aims to measure pain and disability associated with shoulder disease. It consists of a pain section and a disability section with 13 items being responded to on visual analogue scales. Few researchers have investigated SPADI validity in specified diagnostic groups, although the selection of an evaluative instrument should be based on evidence of validity in the target patient group. The aim of the present study was to investigate factor structure of the SPADI in a study population of patients with adhesive capsulitis. Methods The questionnaire was administered to 191 patients with adhesive capsulitis. Descriptive statistics for items and a comparison of scores for the two subscales were produced. Internal consistency was analyzed by use of the Cronbach alpha and a principal components analysis with varimax rotation was conducted. Study design was cross-sectional. Results Two factors were extracted, but the factor structure failed to support the original division of items into separate pain and disability sections. Conclusion We found minimal evidence to justify the use of separate subscales for pain and disability. It is our impression that the SPADI should be viewed as essentially unidimensional in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsTveitå et al.
dc.rightsAttribution 2.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
dc.titleFactor structure of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-10-09T01:03:49Z
dc.creator.authorKristian Tveitå, Einar
dc.creator.authorSandvik, Leiv
dc.creator.authorMarius Ekeberg, Ole
dc.creator.authorGunnar Juel, Niels
dc.creator.authorBautz-Holter, Erik
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-103
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-50489
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/46350/1/12891_2008_Article_509.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid103


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 2.0 Generic
This item's license is: Attribution 2.0 Generic