Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T13:25:19Z
dc.date.available2013-03-12T13:25:19Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-11-23en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/32739
dc.description.abstractIan Castles and David Henderson have criticized IPCC s Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) (IPCC, 2000) for using market exchange rates (MER) instead of purchasing power parities (PPP) when converting regional GDP into a common denominator. The consequence is that poor countries generally appear to be poorer than they actually are. An overstated income gap between rich and poor countries in the base year gives rise to projections of too high economic growth in the poor countries because the scenarios are constructed with the aim of reducing the income gap. Castles and Henderson claim that overstated economic growth means that greenhouse gas emissions are overstated as well. However, because closure of the emission intensity gap between the rich and the poor parts of the world is another important driving force in the scenarios, we argue that the use of MER in the SRES scenarios has not caused an overestimation of the global emission growth because the two types of errors effectively neutralize one another.nor
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPolicy note / CICERO - Senter for klimaforskning http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-3647en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-3647
dc.titleOn the question of PPP corrections to the SRES scenariosen_US
dc.typeResearch reporten_US
dc.date.updated2010-03-16en_US
dc.creator.authorHoltsmark, Bjarten_US
dc.creator.authorAlfsen, Knut H.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::200en_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-17871en_US
dc.type.documentForskningsrapporten_US
dc.identifier.duo68054en_US
dc.identifier.bibsys10ns02004en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

No file.

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata