Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T09:54:22Z
dc.date.available2013-03-12T09:54:22Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-10-21en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/17444
dc.description.abstractCountries rich in natural resources constitute both growth losers and growth winners. We claim that the main reason for these diverging experiences is differences in the quality of institutions. More natural resources push aggregate income down, when institutions are grabber friendly, while more resources raise income, when in- stitutions are producer friendly. We test this theory building on Sachs and Warner's influential works on the resource curse. Our main hypothesis: that institutions are decisive for the resource curse, is confirmed. Our results are in sharp contrast to the claim by Sachs and Warner that institutions do not play a role.nor
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversitetet i Oslo, Økonomisk institutt
dc.relation.ispartofMemorandum fra Økonomisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-7118
dc.relation.urihttp://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-7118
dc.subjectnatural resources institutional quality growth rent-seekingen_US
dc.titleInstitutions and the resource curseen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.date.updated2004-04-01en_US
dc.creator.authorMehlum, Halvoren_US
dc.creator.authorMoene, Kalleen_US
dc.creator.authorTorvik, Ragnaren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::210en_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-3972en_US
dc.type.documentArbeidsnotaten_US
dc.identifier.duo6589en_US
dc.identifier.bibsys040876802en_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/17444/1/memo2902.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata