Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T09:00:57Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T09:00:57Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/109511
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this PhD project was to provide knowledge about various aspects of the Municipal Acute Wards (MAWs) as an alternative to hospitalization. The PhD project included three studies: The first study explored 21 Primary Care Physicians’(PCPs) perspectives on the MAW as an alternative to hospitalization. Findings indicated that PCPs at the out-of-hours service were skeptical to refer patients to a MAW, due to lower medical competence and less diagnostic possibilities compared to in the hospital. However, they perceived that the “diagnostic loop” made it safer to refer patients to a MAW. The second study explored characteristics of 16 786 patients admitted to the MAWs in the period 2014-2020. This study showed that mainly older persons were admitted to the MAW. Patients treated in a MAW mainly needed basic medical treatment, care, and nursing. The results showed that patients were transferred to the hospital when they needed more advanced medical treatment, such as intravenous medication. The third study aimed to assess the quality of healthcare services in MAW compared to those in the hospital. In total, 164 patients were randomized to a hospital or a MAW. Findings from this study indicated that the patients experienced equally positive patient experiences after treatment in a MAW compared to in the hospital. There was a significant larger positive change in self-assessed health -related quality and self-assessed health status for patient allocated to a MAW. Findings in this thesis indicate that despite the PCPs skepticism, the MAWs may provide proper and quality healthcare services in the interface between specialist and primary healthcare. However, the results indicate that there may be a need to adjust the intentions with the MAWs in order to fulfil a future need in healthcare services.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper I: Nystrøm Vivian, Lurås Hilde, Midlöv Patrik, Leonardsen Ann-Chatrin Linqvist. What if something happens tonight? A qualitative study of primary care physicians’ perspectives on an alternative to hospital admittance. BMC Health Serv Res 21, 447 (2021). DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06444-x. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06444-x
dc.relation.haspartPaper II: Nystrøm Vivian, Lurås Hilde, Moger Tron Anders, Leonardsen Ann-Chatrin Linqvist. Finding good alternatives to hospitalisation: a data registry study in five municipal acute wards in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res 22, 715 (2022). DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08066-3. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08066-3
dc.relation.haspartPaper III: Nystrøm Vivian, Lurås Hilde, Moger Tron Anders, Leonardsen Ann-Chatrin Linqvist. Patient experiences and clinical outcomes of admissions to municipal acute wards versus a hospital: A multicentre randomised controlled trial in Norway. Submitted to: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. To be published. The paper is not available in DUO awaiting publishing.
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06444-x
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08066-3
dc.titleAn Issue of Trust: Exploring Different Aspects of the Municipal Acute Ward as an Alternative to Hospitalizationen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorNystrøm, Vivian
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata