Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T13:36:38Z
dc.date.available2023-12-20T13:36:38Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-348-0302-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/106515
dc.description.abstractThis study, conducted at the National Institute of Occupational Health in Norway, delves into the occupational health risks faced by workers exposed to vibration from handheld power tools. The research, led by Thomas Clemm as part of his PhD work at the University of Oslo addresses the limited understanding of dose-response mechanisms for neurological symptoms. The challenge of biased exposure measurements, especially in hand-guided tools like rock drills, is acknowledged, emphasizing the need for accurate exposure assessment. The research, involving 148 workers in road maintenance, evaluates dose-response relationships between HAV exposure and vibration perception thresholds (VPT) and pegboard scores. Lifetime cumulative exposure and daily vibration exposure were measured, employing health examinations, including VPT and Pegboard tests, at baseline, 2 years, and 4 years. The findings highlight a significant exposure-response relationship between rock drill exposure and VPT, with a stronger correlation using a novel exposure measure. Even workers with relatively low exposure from impact wrenches exhibit increased VPT, challenging the safety limit level. The 500 Hz test frequency emerges as a potential marker for early signs of reduced tactile sensitivity. Simultaneous measurements using tool-attached and hand-attached accelerometers reveal a significant difference, with individual working techniques influencing the variance. This underscores the importance of careful assessment and consideration of accelerometer placement to avoid exposure misclassification. The study concludes that exposure from rock drills correlates with increased VPT, suggesting a basis for risk models of HAVS. It emphasizes the need to reconsider the exposure limit level and explore the 500 Hz frequency as an early marker. The research also cautions against bias introduced by hand-attached accelerometers, underscoring the importance of precise exposure assessments in occupational health studies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper I. Thomas Clemm, Karl Færden, Bente Ulvestad, Lars-Kristian Lunde, Karl-Christian Nordby. Dose–response relationship between hand–arm vibration exposure and vibrotactile thresholds among roadworkers. Occup Environ Med, 2020. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105926. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105926
dc.relation.haspartPaper II. Thomas Clemm, Karl-Christian Nordby, Lars-Kristian Lunde, Bente Ulvestad and Magne Bråtveit. Hand-Arm Vibration Exposure in Rock Drill Workers: A Comparison between Measurements with Hand-Attached and Tool-Attached Accelerometers. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 2021, 1–10. DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxab051. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab051
dc.relation.haspartPaper III. Clemm T, Lunde L-K, Ulvestad B, et al. Exposure-response relationship between hand-arm vibration exposure and vibrotactile thresholds among rock drill operators: a 4-year cohort study. Occup Environ Med, 2022. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108293. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2022-108293
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105926
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab051
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2022-108293
dc.titleBad vibrations: Exposure-response between rock drilling and vibration sensitivity at the fingertipsen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorClemm, Thomas Aleksander Clausen
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata