Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorMørk, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorHoksrud, Aasne F.
dc.contributor.authorSoberg, Helene L.
dc.contributor.authorZucknick, Manuela
dc.contributor.authorHeide, Marte
dc.contributor.authorGroven, Karen S.
dc.contributor.authorRøe, Cecilie
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-10T05:03:06Z
dc.date.available2022-05-10T05:03:06Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022 May 03;23(1):416
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/93926
dc.description.abstractBackground Foot disorders affect up to one quarter of the adult population. Plantar fasciopathy is a common cause of foot pain associated with decreased activity level and quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures are important in assessing the burden of a condition as well as in research on the effects of interventions. The Foot Function Index revised short form (FFI-RS) is a region specific questionnaire frequently used in research. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the FFI-RS into Norwegian and to test its psychometric properties. Methods The FFI-RS was translated into Norwegian (FFI-RSN) following international guidelines. 139 patients with foot disorders (88% with plantar fasciopathy) were included at baseline to measure internal consistency, explorative factor analysis, construct validity and floor and ceiling effects. 54 patients were included after 1 week for test-retest reliability and smallest detectable change analyses. 100 patients were included for responsiveness and minimal important change at 3 months. Results Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency was 0.97 and factor analysis supported the use of the total score of the FFI-RSN. Two out of three predefined hypotheses were confirmed by assessing the construct validity with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Quadratic weighted Kappa for test-retest reliability showed 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.96) and the smallest detectable change was 6.5%. The minimal important change was 8.4% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for responsiveness was 0.78 (95% CI 0.69–0.87). We found no floor or ceiling effects on the total score of the FFI-RSN. Conclusions The present study showed excellent reliability of the FFI-RSN and supports the use of the total score of the questionnaire. Furthermore, we found the FFI-RSN to have acceptable responsiveness in relation to change in general health. Smallest detectable change, minimal important change and responsiveness were presented as novel results of the total score of the FFI-RS. FFI-RSN can be used to evaluate global foot health in clinical or research settings with Norwegian patients suffering from plantar fasciopathy. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT04207164. Initial release 01.11.19.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title“Psychometric properties of the Norwegian foot function index revised short form”
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2022-05-10T05:03:07Z
dc.creator.authorMørk, Marianne
dc.creator.authorHoksrud, Aasne F.
dc.creator.authorSoberg, Helene L.
dc.creator.authorZucknick, Manuela
dc.creator.authorHeide, Marte
dc.creator.authorGroven, Karen S.
dc.creator.authorRøe, Cecilie
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05374-x
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-96483
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/93926/1/12891_2022_Article_5374.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid416


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International