Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T15:36:01Z
dc.date.available2021-07-06T15:36:01Z
dc.date.created2021-07-02T09:22:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSolheim, Øyvind Bugge Jupskås, Anders Ravik . Consensus or Conflict? A Survey Analysis of how Norwegians Interpret the July 22, 2011 Attacks a Decade Later. Perspectives on Terrorism. 2021, 15(3), 109-131
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/86554
dc.description.abstractThe dominant narrative about the right-wing terrorist attacks in Norway on July 22, 2011, suggests that they were an attack on the Norwegian democracy, that the perpetrator was motivated by right-wing extremism and that Norway reacted by emphasizing tolerance, democratic values, and inclusion. Surveys carried out in the aftermath of the attacks show that this narrative received widespread support. In this article, we use a nationally representative survey to analyze how Norwegians interpret the July 22 attacks today – a decade later. We find significant levels of consensus, but also traces of conflict. While there are high levels of agreement regarding many of the interpretive frames, some of the frames are more contested. Moreover, some of these contested interpretations are associated with three conflicting narratives about the terrorist attack: the democracy narrative, the diversity narrative and the far-right narrative. These narratives are all characterized by a distinct understanding of why the attacks happened, who was targeted and how society reacted to the attacks. Given that the support for the different narratives varies according to ideological beliefs, partisanship, levels of trust and, to some extent, emotional reactions, we argue that discussions about July 22 today are likely to be politically polarizing – or even irreconcilable. The article shows how terrorist attacks that appear uniting in the short run may become more divisive in the long run, mirroring other existing political conflicts in society.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherTerrorism Research Initiative and the Center for Terrorism and Security Studies
dc.titleConsensus or Conflict? A Survey Analysis of how Norwegians Interpret the July 22, 2011 Attacks a Decade Later
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorSolheim, Øyvind Bugge
dc.creator.authorJupskås, Anders Ravik
cristin.unitcode185,17,8,10
cristin.unitnameSenter for ekstremismeforskning: høyreekstremisme, hatkriminalitet og politisk vold
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1919974
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Perspectives on Terrorism&rft.volume=15&rft.spage=109&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitlePerspectives on Terrorism
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage109
dc.identifier.endpage131
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-89179
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2334-3745
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/86554/2/solheim-and-jupskas%25282%2529.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/295985


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata