• English
    • Norsk
  • English 
    • English
    • Norsk
  • Administration
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Høstingsarkiver
  • CRIStin høstingsarkiv
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Høstingsarkiver
  • CRIStin høstingsarkiv
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Two methods for modifed Doo-Sabin modeling of nonsmooth surfaces - Applied to right ventricle modeling

Bølviken, Håkon Strand; Bersvendsen, Jørn; Orderud, Fredrik; Snare, Sten Roar; Brekke, Pål Haugar; Samset, Eigil
Journal article; PublishedVersion; Peer reviewed
View/Open
JMI-20125R_online.pdf (2.560Mb)
Year
2020
Permanent link
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-88183

CRIStin
1872540

Metadata
Show metadata
Appears in the following Collection
  • Institutt for informatikk [4043]
  • CRIStin høstingsarkiv [22204]
Original version
Journal of Medical Imaging. 2020, 7 (06):067001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.6.067001
Abstract
Purpose: In recent years, there has been increased clinical interest in the right ventricle (RV) of the heart. RV dysfunction is an important prognostic marker for several cardiac diseases. Accurate modeling of the RV shape is important for estimating the performance. We have created computationally effective models that allow for accurate estimation of the RV shape.

Approach: Previous approaches to cardiac shape modeling, including modeling the RV geometry, has used Doo–Sabin surfaces. Doo–Sabin surfaces allow effective computation and adapt to smooth, organic surfaces. However, they struggle with modeling sharp corners or ridges without many control nodes. We modified the Doo–Sabin surface to allow for sharpness using weighting of vertices and edges instead. This was done in two different ways. For validation, we compared the standard Doo–Sabin versus the sharp Doo–Sabin models in modeling the RV shape of 16 cardiac ultrasound images, against a ground truth manually drawn by a cardiologist. A Kalman filter fitted the models to the ultrasound images, and the difference between the volume of the model and the ground truth was measured.

Results: The two modified Doo–Sabin models both outperformed the standard Doo–Sabin model in modeling the RV. On average, the regular Doo–Sabin had an 8-ml error in volume, whereas the sharp models had 7- and 6-ml error, respectively.

Conclusions: Compared with the standard Doo–Sabin, the modified Doo–Sabin models can adapt to a larger variety of surfaces while still being compact models. They were more accurate on modeling the RV shape and could have uses elsewhere.
 
Responsible for this website 
University of Oslo Library


Contact Us 
duo-hjelp@ub.uio.no


Privacy policy
 

 

For students / employeesSubmit master thesisAccess to restricted material

Browse

All of DUOCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitles

For library staff

Login
RSS Feeds
 
Responsible for this website 
University of Oslo Library


Contact Us 
duo-hjelp@ub.uio.no


Privacy policy