Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-01-28T20:24:33Z
dc.date.available2021-01-28T20:24:33Z
dc.date.created2021-01-19T14:43:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPapageorgiou, Spyridon Tilen, Raphael Vandevska-Radunovic, Vaska Eliades, Theodore . Occlusal outcome after orthodontic treatment with preadjusted straight-wire and standard edgewise appliances A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/82689
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose Orthodontic fixed appliances have been proven to be effective in treating a wide variety of malocclusions, and different types of appliances have emerged during recent decades. However, the comparative effects of different appliances have not been adequately assessed. Thus, the aim was to assess the occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment with preadjusted straight-wire (SWIRE) and standard edgewise (SEDGE) appliances. Methods In all, 56 patients (mean age: 13.5 years; 45% male) receiving extraction-based treatment with either SWIRE or SEDGE appliances were included. Between-group differences in the occlusal outcome assessed with the American Board of Orthodontists Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) and treatment duration were analyzed statistically at the 5% level. Results The average ABO-OGS score was 31.3 ± 7.2 points and 34.0 ± 10.4 points in the SWIRE and SEDGE groups with no statistically significant difference between groups ( P  = 0.26). Treatment duration was significantly shorter in the SWIRE group compared to the SEDGE group, with an average difference of −6.8 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = −9.6 to −4.0 months; P  < 0.001). Likewise, fewer visits were needed with SWIRE compared to SEDGE appliances with an average difference of −7.2 visits (95% CI = −10.3 to −4.2 visits; P  < 0.001). Adjusting for the influence of any potential confounders did not considerably impact the results. Conclusion Similar treatment outcomes were observed after premolar extraction treatment with SWIRE and SEDGE appliances. On the other hand, SEDGE appliances were associated with prolonged treatment duration and more visits needed to complete treatment compared to SWIRE appliances.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleOcclusal outcome after orthodontic treatment with preadjusted straight-wire and standard edgewise appliances A retrospective cohort study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorPapageorgiou, Spyridon
dc.creator.authorTilen, Raphael
dc.creator.authorVandevska-Radunovic, Vaska
dc.creator.authorEliades, Theodore
cristin.unitcode185,16,17,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk odontologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1874497
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Orofacial Orthopedics
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00273-z
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-85542
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1434-5293
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/82689/2/Papageorgiou2021_Article_OcclusalOutcomeAfterOrthodonti.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International