Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2020-04-04T18:17:27Z
dc.date.available2020-04-08T22:46:18Z
dc.date.created2018-11-09T20:42:14Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationLinnebo, Øystein . Rumfitt on the logic of set theory. Inquiry (Oslo). 2018, 62(7), 826-841
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/74367
dc.description.abstractAccording to a famous argument by Dummett, the concept of set is indefinitely extensible, and the logic appropriate for reasoning about the instances of any such concept is intuitionistic, not classical. But Dummett's argument is widely regarded as obscure. This note explains how the final chapter of Rumfitt's important new book advances our understanding of Dummett's argument, but it also points out some problems and unanswered questions. Finally, Rumfitt's reconstruction of Dummett's argument is contrasted with my own preferred alternative.
dc.languageEN
dc.titleRumfitt on the logic of set theory
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorLinnebo, Øystein
cristin.unitcode185,14,33,20
cristin.unitnameFilosofi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1628898
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Inquiry (Oslo)&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=826&rft.date=2018
dc.identifier.jtitleInquiry (Oslo)
dc.identifier.volume62
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage826
dc.identifier.endpage841
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2018.1530832
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-77478
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0020-174X
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/74367/2/Rumfitt.pdf
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion
dc.relation.projectFORBRUKERRÅDET/250654


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata