• English
    • Norsk
  • English 
    • English
    • Norsk
  • Administration
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Høstingsarkiver
  • CRIStin høstingsarkiv
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Høstingsarkiver
  • CRIStin høstingsarkiv
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Why pro‐life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics

Räsänen, Joona
Journal article; AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed
View/Open
WHY+PRO-LIFE+AR ... ILL+ARE+NOT+CONVINCING.pdf (432.0Kb)
Year
2018
Permanent link
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-76136

CRIStin
1632071

Metadata
Show metadata
Appears in the following Collection
  • Institutt for filosofi, ide- og kunsthistorie og klassiske språk [328]
  • CRIStin høstingsarkiv [16801]
Original version
Bioethics. 2018, 32 (9), 628-633, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12502
Abstract
I argued in ‘Pro‐life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing’ that arguments presented by pro‐life philosophers are mistaken and cannot show infanticide to be immoral. Several scholars have offered responses to my arguments. In this paper, I reply to my critics: Daniel Rodger, Bruce P. Blackshaw and Clinton Wilcox. I also reply to Christopher Kaczor. I argue that pro‐life arguments still are not convincing.
 
Responsible for this website 
University of Oslo Library


Contact Us 
duo-hjelp@ub.uio.no


Privacy policy
 

 

For students / employeesSubmit master thesisAccess to restricted material

Browse

All of DUOCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitles

For library staff

Login
RSS Feeds
 
Responsible for this website 
University of Oslo Library


Contact Us 
duo-hjelp@ub.uio.no


Privacy policy