Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2018-08-27T09:40:33Z
dc.date.available2018-08-27T09:40:33Z
dc.date.created2017-11-29T09:54:18Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationAmes, Heather Njang, Diangha Mabel Glenton, Claire Fretheim, Atle Kaufman, Jessica Hill, Sophie Oku, Afiong Cliff, Julie Cartier, Yuri Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier Rada, Gabriel Muloliwa, Artur Manuel Oyo-Ita, Angela Paschal Kum, Awar Lewin, Simon Arnold . Stakeholder perceptions of communication about vaccination in two regions of Cameroon: A qualitative case study. PLoS ONE. 2017, 12(8)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/63785
dc.description.abstractBackground: Understanding stakeholders’ (parents’, communities’ and health workers’) perspectives of communication about childhood vaccination, including their preferences for its format, delivery and content, is an important step towards designing better communication strategies and ensuring more informed parents. Our objectives were to explore stakeholders’ views, experiences and preferences for childhood vaccination communication in Cameroon. Methods: In 2014, in the Central and North West Regions of Cameron, we gathered qualitative data for our case study using the following methods: semi structured interviews; observations and informal conversations during routine immunization clinics and three rounds of the National Polio Immunization Campaign; document analysis of reports and mass media communications about vaccination; and a survey of parents. We conducted a thematic analysis of the qualitative data to identify themes relating to views, experiences and perceptions of vaccination information and its delivery. Survey data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics. Results: All of the parents interviewed felt that vaccinating their child was important, and trusted the information provided by health workers. However, many parents wanted more information. Parents did not always feel that they could ask questions during vaccination appointments. All participants felt that health workers and vaccination clinics were important sources of information. Social mobilisation activities such as door-to-door visits and announcements during religious services were important and accepted ways of communicating information, especially during vaccination campaigns. Information communicated through mass media and text messages was also seen as important. In general, stakeholders believed that more consistent messaging about routine vaccination through community channels would be helpful to remind parents of the importance of routine vaccination during ongoing rounds of vaccination campaigns against polio. Conclusions: This study confirms that parents regard information about childhood vaccination as important, but that health services need to be organized in ways that prioritize and facilitate communication, particularly about routine vaccination.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleStakeholder perceptions of communication about vaccination in two regions of Cameroon: A qualitative case studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorAmes, Heather
dc.creator.authorNjang, Diangha Mabel
dc.creator.authorGlenton, Claire
dc.creator.authorFretheim, Atle
dc.creator.authorKaufman, Jessica
dc.creator.authorHill, Sophie
dc.creator.authorOku, Afiong
dc.creator.authorCliff, Julie
dc.creator.authorCartier, Yuri
dc.creator.authorBosch-Capblanch, Xavier
dc.creator.authorRada, Gabriel
dc.creator.authorMuloliwa, Artur Manuel
dc.creator.authorOyo-Ita, Angela
dc.creator.authorPaschal Kum, Awar
dc.creator.authorLewin, Simon Arnold
cristin.unitcode185,52,14,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for samfunnsmedisin og global helse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1520014
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLoS ONE&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitlePLoS ONE
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.pagecount23
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183721
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-66330
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/63785/2/Ames_2017_Sta.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide0183721


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International