The models of contingency in what propositions, properties and relations there are developed in Part 1 are related to models of contingency in what propositions there are due to Robert Stalnaker. It is shown that some but not all of the classes of models of Part 1 agree with Stalnaker’s models concerning the patterns of contingency in what propositions there are they admit. Further structural connections between the two kinds of models are explored.
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10992-017-9432-3