Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2017-07-18T14:34:57Z
dc.date.available2017-07-18T14:34:57Z
dc.date.created2017-07-18T13:38:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationAustvoll-Dahlgren, Astrid Semakula, Daniel Nsangi, Allen Oxman, Andrew David Chalmers, Iain Rosenbaum, Sarah Guttersrud, Øystein . Measuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: the development of the 'Claim Evaluation Tools'. BMJ Open. 2017, 7(5)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/56087
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To describe the development of the Claim Evaluation Tools, a set of flexible items to measure people's ability to assess claims about treatment effects. Setting: Methodologists and members of the community (including children) in Uganda, Rwanda, Kenya, Norway, the UK and Australia. Participants: In the iterative development of the items, we used purposeful sampling of people with training in research methodology, such as teachers of evidence-based medicine, as well as patients and members of the public from low-income and high-income countries. Development consisted of 4 processes: (1) determining the scope of the Claim Evaluation Tools and development of items; (2) expert item review and feedback (n=63); (3) cognitive interviews with children and adult end-users (n=109); and (4) piloting and administrative tests (n=956). Results: The Claim Evaluation Tools database currently includes a battery of multiple-choice items. Each item begins with a scenario which is intended to be relevant across contexts, and which can be used for children (from age 10  and above), adult members of the public and health professionals. People with expertise in research methods judged the items to have face validity, and end-users judged them relevant and acceptable in their settings. In response to feedback from methodologists and end-users, we simplified some text, explained terms where needed, and redesigned formats and instructions. Conclusions: The Claim Evaluation Tools database is a flexible resource from which researchers, teachers and others can design measurement instruments to meet their own requirements. These evaluation tools are being managed and made freely available for non-commercial use (on request) through Testing Treatments interactive (testingtreatments.org).en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleMeasuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: the development of the 'Claim Evaluation Tools'en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorAustvoll-Dahlgren, Astrid
dc.creator.authorSemakula, Daniel
dc.creator.authorNsangi, Allen
dc.creator.authorOxman, Andrew David
dc.creator.authorChalmers, Iain
dc.creator.authorRosenbaum, Sarah
dc.creator.authorGuttersrud, Øystein
cristin.unitcode185,15,27,0
cristin.unitnameNaturfagsenteret
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1482513
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMJ Open&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=&rft.date=2017
dc.identifier.jtitleBMJ Open
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pagecount12
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013184
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-58845
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/56087/2/Austvoll-Dahlgren_2017_Mea2.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide013184


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International