Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2017-06-22T12:01:33Z
dc.date.available2017-06-22T12:01:33Z
dc.date.created2015-09-23T14:13:34Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationLobben, Marit D’Ascenzo, Stefania . Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammaticality judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015, 6, 1-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/55682
dc.description.abstractEmbodied cognitive theories predict that linguistic conceptual representations are grounded and continually represented in real world, sensorimotor experiences. However, there is an on-going debate on whether this also holds for abstract concepts. Grammar is the archetype of abstract knowledge, and therefore constitutes a test case against embodied theories of language representation. Former studies have largely focussed on lexical-level embodied representations. In the present study we take the grounding-by-modality idea a step further by using reaction time (RT) data from the linguistic processing of nominal classifiers in Chinese. We take advantage of an independent body of research, which shows that attention in hand space is biased. Specifically, objects near the hand consistently yield shorter RTs as a function of readiness for action on graspable objects within reaching space, and the same biased attention inhibits attentional disengagement. We predicted that this attention bias would equally apply to the graspable object classifier but not to the big object classifier. Chinese speakers (N = 22) judged grammatical congruency of classifier-noun combinations in two conditions: graspable object classifier and big object classifier. We found that RTs for the graspable object classifier were significantly faster in congruent combinations, and significantly slower in incongruent combinations, than the big object classifier. There was no main effect on grammatical violations, but rather an interaction effect of classifier type. Thus, we demonstrate here grammatical category-specific effects pertaining to the semantic content and by extension the visual and tactile modality of acquisition underlying the acquisition of these categories. We conclude that abstract grammatical categories are subjected to the same mechanisms as general cognitive and neurophysiological processes and may therefore be grounded.en_US
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleGrounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammaticality judgment of Chinese nominal classifiersen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.creator.authorLobben, Marit
dc.creator.authorD’Ascenzo, Stefania
cristin.unitcode185,17,5,0
cristin.unitnamePsykologisk institutt
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1266913
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Frontiers in Psychology&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2015
dc.identifier.jtitleFrontiers in Psychology
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.endpage15
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01299
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-58458
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/55682/1/fpsyg-06-01299.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid1299


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International