Now showing items 1-6 of 6

  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2018)
    This paper contributes to an on-going exchange in political theory on the normative legitimacy of expert bodies. It focuses on epistemic worries about the expertisation of politics, and uses the Nordic system of advisory ...
  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2019)
    Epistemic democrats are rightly concerned with the quality of outcomes and judge democratic procedures in terms of their ability to ‘track the truth’. However, their impetus to assess ‘rule by experts’ and ‘rule by the ...
  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Chapter / Bokkapittel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2019)
  • Christensen, Johan; Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Book / AcceptedVersion / Bok; Peer reviewed, 2022)
    This book offers a concise and accessible introduction to debates about expertise, policy-making and democracy. It uniquely combines an overview of recent research on the policy role of experts with discussions in political ...
  • Molander, Anders; Holst, Cathrine (Chapter / Bokkapittel / PublishedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2009)
  • Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Chapter / Bokkapittel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2021)
    The chapter discusses challenges arising from the growing role of experts and expert knowledge in policymaking. It identifies a series of distinguishable epistemic and democratic worries about “expertization.” Examples are ...