Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T12:52:43Z
dc.date.available2013-03-12T12:52:43Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-05-14en_US
dc.identifier.citationDesser, Arna Sue. Preferences for prevention programs against chronic disease: does expected cause of death matter?. Masteroppgave, University of Oslo, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/30347
dc.description.abstractWestern countries devote significant resources to prevention of chronic illnesses, particularly cardiovascular disease (CVD). Consequently, life expectancy increases but deaths from other causes, such as cancer, also rise. Preferences for additional longevity later in life may be sensitive to expected cause of death, but this factor is typically ignored in economic evaluations of chronic disease prevention programs. We use current Norwegian mortality date to estimate life expectancy gains and changed distributions of cause of death associated with CVD and cancer prevention programs. For realistic levels of risk reduction, prevention programs against CVD and cancer increase longevity by 6 and 4 months, respectively. We survey a random sample of 2700 Norwegians, ages 40– 67, to examine preferences for prevention programs against CVD and cancer when individuals are informed about expected increases in life expectancy and resulting changes in the distribution of cause of death in the population. The survey is randomized for named vs. unnamed disease (CVD/cancer vs. Condition X/Y), medical vs. life-style interventions, and individual vs. societal perspective. A pilot study improved the design of the final survey. Results show little evidence that a desire for an “easy” death influenced respondents’ willingness to participate in a CVD prevention program; respondents accepted the offer of both CVD and cancer prevention at similar rates of 61%. Participation decisions were influenced by framing: more were willing to accept intervention if the disease was named and if treatment involved life-style changes rather than pharmaceutical treatment. Willingness-to-pay for prevention was low, with only 26% of the full sample agreeing to pay 150 NOK per month for CVD prevention, and 28% willing to pay for cancer prevention.nor
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titlePreferences for prevention programs against chronic disease: does expected cause of death matter?en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.date.updated2008-09-02en_US
dc.creator.authorDesser, Arna Sueen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::806en_US
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.au=Desser, Arna Sue&rft.title=Preferences for prevention programs against chronic disease: does expected cause of death matter?&rft.inst=University of Oslo&rft.date=2008&rft.degree=Masteroppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-19756en_US
dc.type.documentMasteroppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.duo75243en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorIvar Sønbø Kristiansenen_US
dc.identifier.bibsys082330859en_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/30347/1/Masterxdesser.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata