Now showing items 1-7 of 7

  • Räsänen, Joona (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / PublishedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2020)
    In an article of this journal, Perry Hendricks makes a novel argument for the immorality of abortion. According to his impairment argument, abortion is immoral because: (a) it is wrong to impair a fetus to the nth degree, ...
  • Räsänen, Joona (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2020)
    Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen discuss my ‘Moral case for legal age change’ in their article ‘Age change, official age and fairness in health’. They argue that in important healthcare settings (such as distributing vital ...
  • Räsänen, Joona (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2017)
    Many people believe that the abortion debate will end when at some point in the future it will be possible for fetuses to develop outside the womb. Ectogenesis, as this technology is called, would make possible to reconcile ...
  • Räsänen, Joona (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2019)
    In ‘Moral case for legal age change’, I argue that sometimes people should be allowed to change their age. I refute six immediate objections against the view that age change is permissible. I argue that the objections ...
  • Räsänen, Joona (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2019)
    Should a person who feels his legal age does not correspond with his experienced age be allowed to change his legal age? In this paper, I argue that in some cases people should be allowed to change their legal age. Such ...
  • Räsänen, Joona (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2020)
    This paper defends and develops Elizabeth Harman’s Actual Future Principle with a concept called Schrödinger’s Fetus. I argue that all early fetuses are Schrödinger’s Fetuses: those early fetuses that survive and become ...
  • Räsänen, Joona (Journal article / Tidsskriftartikkel / AcceptedVersion; Peer reviewed, 2018)
    I argued in ‘Pro‐life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing’ that arguments presented by pro‐life philosophers are mistaken and cannot show infanticide to be immoral. Several scholars have offered ...